Overview of ECE Academic HP Labs
The intent of this message is to provide background and some explanations as to why Electrical & Computer Engineering computing operates as it does.
Some of the topics are written in response to the surveys collected in the student labs. The results of those surveys help us to plan expenditures and make or modify the policies that govern the facilities.
Index
In the early 1990's the College of Engineering realized
that it could no longer afford to keep its computing facilities up to
date so long as it had to rely upon the inconsistent funds provided by
the University. By 1993 the problem was so acute that the College of
Engineering sought approval from the OSU Board of Trustees to collect
a $120 per quarter computing lab fee from each Engineering student.
Approval was granted and the Engineering Computing Lab Fee was
instituted in Spring Quarter 1993.
For purposes of decision making and allocation of the collected lab
fees, the College was organized into seven computing regions. Most
regions were comprised of several departments, however
Electrical & Computer Engineering (the just "EE") was sufficiently large
that it was the only department placed in
Engineering Region 4 (ER4).
The direction of Region 4 is set by the Region 4 Computing Committee
which is comprised of ECE faculty and students. Committee meetings are
open to anyone.
Students who are have majors in the department pay the computing
lab fee whenever they enroll. Their fee, less an overhead amount of
about 5%, goes into Region 4's student fee account. Lab fee money can
be spent only on computing items that directly support instructional
computing. Permitted items include hardware (computer and network),
access (keycard, lab furniture, consultants), and software. Computing
fee dollars may not be spent on items such as paper, toner, lab
cameras, staff salaries, and "supply" items.
The College of Engineering also contributes money to each
region. These funds can be spent on computing
related items which cannot be bought using student lab fees. Such
expenditures include staff salaries, HVAC, tools and operational
supplies, among other things.
In July of 1997, the "Regional" structure was abandoned, with
control over the regional facilities reverting to the Departments. As
Region 4 served only ECE, this wasn't much of a problem for this
department. The site manager now answers directly to the department
chair.
In this section you will find background on why things are the way
they are today, and what the future may hold for ER4.
Choice of Workstations
- The single strongest driving force behind choice of hardware
platform is the availability of the software required by the students
classwork to run on a given platform. Today, this requires both Unix
(Red Hat Enterprise) and a Windows (XP) systems.
- The initial decision to use a Unix based platform was strongly
influenced by the package Matlab, which at the time was only available
under Unix. Today, portions of Mentor Graphics and Cadence continue
to be unavailable under the Windows platform.
- The move into the Windows arena was partially driven by the
availability of such packages as Xilinx and PSpice which best suit
certain ECE classes. These packages are PC specific. In addition there
was significant demand from some students for this OS.
- In addition to the practical matters of software availability, the
committee believes that exposure to a variety of state-of-the-art
systems, is a very important ingredient to the success of the student
in the marketplace.
- Recent feedback from industry representatives indicates that
exposing students to Mentor Graphics and similar packages makes those
students very attractive in industry, and the recent increase in ECE
hiring is, in part, due to improving these types of computer-related
skills of our graduates.
In 1995 ER4 joined the other computing regions in
installing card readers. As of today, card readers are available on
both buildings and on all the ER4 labs. Access is granted to all
students taking ECE classes.
Neither Dreese nor Caldwell were designed to carry the
heat loads generated by computers and the people using them. The
predictable result is that DL557 and DL817 can be uncomfortable at
times. Unfortunately there is no source of funds to pay for an
overhaul of the HVAC system. Fortunately DL517 had a pre-existing
HVAC unit when ER4 assumed use of the room.
The remodeling of CL260 resulted in a brand new facility with its
own HVAC system designed to handle the heat generated by the people
and machines contained within. In practice it has been found that
when the lab is not full, the lab can be considered "cold" by some
users. When the lab is full, it can be considered "hot" by others.
For most of the quarter, that lab is full, and so we error on that
side of judgment. If you are going to be in the lab at an unpopular
time, no matter the outside temperature, you may want to bring a
sweater or jacket for while you are in the lab if you fall into the
"cold" category.
Surveys show that most students feel here are an adequate number
of computers in the labs, though there is a significant minority who
would like additional seats. Unfortunately the department does not
have space for an expansion of the ER4 facilities.
ER4 exercises great restraint when considering new
software products. It is very easy to start buying all sorts of
software and end up confusing students and faculty alike. Therefore,
the ER4 committee tries to ensure that any product added: 1) addresses
an instructional need of the department; 2) does not significantly
duplicate an existing functionality; and 3) is a market leader and a
good value. Additionally, an expensive product will not be purchased
using lab fee money unless it can be demonstrated that it is a benefit
to multiple students, generally across multiple courses.
The software below comprises the core offerings of
ER4:
- Matlab: The ECE department faculty pretty much brought
Matlab to OSU about a decade ago. It was a quality package then and is
still highly regarded today. Matlab gives OSU a significantly reduced
cost site license, which is paid for by your student lab fee.
- Maple: Maple is a widely used symbolic math package.
- LabView: National Instruments offers this widely used
package as "graphical programming for instrumentation". It is
available in the department not only the ER4 workstations but on many
instructional lab PCs as well.
- Mentor Graphics: This package was the cornerstone of ER4's
instructional offerings in the mid-to-late 1990's and Mentor was
integrated into many of the ECE courses and research at that time.
- Xilinx
- Cadence: is a complete microchip EDA system, capable of
developing professional, full-scale, mixed-signal microchips and breadboards.
The modules included in the toolset are for schematic entry, design simulation,
data analysis, physical layout, and final verification. The Cadence tools
at Ohio State are the same as those used by professional mixed-signal
microelectronics companies in the United States.
- ECEsof: A premier microwave design tool from HP.
- C, C++, FORTRAN, PASCAL compilers: ER4 provides most of the
common development tools, including language compilers on the Unix systems
and Visual Studio under Windows.
- MS Office: Microsoft has a campus wide agreement that allows ER4
to provide MS Office on all the region Windows systems.
For simplicity you can always send your messages to site. But there are
other address you may want to know about:
Site Management: site@ece.osu.edu
Computing Committee: rcc4@ece.osu.edu
Suggestion Box: suggest@ece.osu.edu
ECE Webserver: http://www.ece.osu.edu
|